Kansainvälisten e-aineistojen haku vaatii toistaiseksi kirjautumista, jotta hakuja voi tehdä.

Haku

Implications of peat soil conceptualization for groundwater exfiltration in numerical modeling:a study on a hypothetical peatland hillslope

QR-koodi

Implications of peat soil conceptualization for groundwater exfiltration in numerical modeling:a study on a hypothetical peatland hillslope

Abstract

Fully integrated physically based hydrological modeling is an essential method for increasing hydrological understanding of groundwater‐surface water (GW‐SW) interactions in peatlands and for predicting anthropogenic impacts on these unique ecosystems. Modeling studies represent peat soil in a simplistic manner, as a homogeneous layer of uniform thickness, but field measurements consistently show pronounced spatial variability in peatlands. This study evaluated uncertainty in groundwater levels and exfiltration fluxes associated with the simplified representation of the peat soil layer. For transferability of the results, impacts of selected topographical and hydrogeological conceptual models on GW‐SW exchange fluxes were simulated in a hypothetical hillslope representing a typical aquifer‐mire transect. The results showed that peat soil layer geometry defined the simulated spatial GW‐SW exchange patterns and groundwater flow paths, whereas total groundwater exfiltration flux to the hillslope and groundwater level in the peatland were only subtly altered by different conceptual peat soil geometry models. GW‐SW interactions were further explored using different scenarios and dimensionless parameters for peat hydraulic conductivity and hillslope‐peatland system slope. The results indicated that accurate representation of physical peat soil properties and landscape topography is important when the main objective is to model spatial GW‐SW exchange. Groundwater level in virtual peatland was not greatly affected by groundwater drawdown in an adjacent aquifer, but the magnitude and spatial distribution of GW‐SW interactions was significantly altered. This means that commonly used groundwater depth observations near peat‐mineral soil interfaces and within peatlands may not be a suitable indicator for monitoring the hydrological state of groundwater‐dependent peatland ecosystems.

Tallennettuna:
Kysy apua / Ask for help

Sisältöä ei voida näyttää

Chat-sisältöä ei voida näyttää evästeasetusten vuoksi. Nähdäksesi sisällön sinun tulee sallia evästeasetuksista seuraavat: Chat-palveluiden evästeet.

Evästeasetukset